Uappy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920407522
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Northport, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6319921210
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,530
- Expenses
- $16,356
- Assets
- $9,815
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Anya Cartwright (President and Treasurer)
- Alexandra Cartwright (Vice-president and Secretary)
- Volodymyr Butiaiev (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Anya Cartwright (President and Treasurer)
- Alexandra Cartwright (Vice-president and Secretary)
- Inna Sus (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Animal Welfare, Animal Rescue, Prevention of cruelty to animals
What it reported doing in 2025
UAPPY INC has successfully initiated the development of an Animal Sanctuary, aiming to provide sanctuary and rehabilitation for displaced animals. Of 96 animals who receive food and care, 13 dogs and 16 cats were Sanctuary residents in 2025 (of which 6 dogs were adopted since), 31 dog and 49 cats receive care through a foster network.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 68.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 65.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 42.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.