Tzahal Shalom of N Westchester Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474179981
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Armonk, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9142440277
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Peace and Security
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,454
- Expenses
- $75,789
- Assets
- $401,268
- Liabilities
- $19,518
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOHN GOLDENBERG (CHAIRMAN)
- DOUGLAS S SHAPIRO (TREASURER)
- ANITA GREENWALD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Tzahal shalom of n. Westchester, inc.'s mission is to establish, maintain and strengthen connections between our community and israel and its people.
What it reported doing in 2024
Every year for 10 days each october, tzahal shalom of n. Westchester hosts former members of the israel defense forces (idf) in northern westchester. These delegates stay with local families and speak at numerous local events. As a result, members of the community, including seniors, adults and children, of different religious affiliations and backgrounds, are given the opportunity to learn more about israeli politics and culture. These delegates are chosen based on their experiences in the idf, characters, enthusiasm about the program and communications skills.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 3
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.4%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -270.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.29; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -39.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -22.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.4% of revenue deployed · 1.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $901 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.