Two State Young Men's Christian Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042105946
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Becket, MA, USA
Phone
4136238991
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,177,579
Expenses
$12,151,402
Assets
$36,386,259
Liabilities
$2,145,241

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY GUTSCHENRITTER (CEO & CLERK)
  • SHANNON DONOVAN-MONIT (CC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MATTHEW SCHOLL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, OPERAT)
  • LAURA CHRISTIAN (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER ANDRYSIAK (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMY GUTSCHENRITTER (CEO & CLERK): $287,185 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTINE KALAKAY (CFO): $186,681 total reported compensation
  • SHANNON DONOVAN-MONIT (CC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $148,119 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Helping youth discover their potential through life-changing experiences and relationships.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization provides resident and day camps for boys and girls during the summer. The programs provide a lasting experience of personal enrichment by offering adventure and learning activities that provide challenges, mental development, physical well-being, and social growth. The travel and service programs develop teens' leadership skills in a supportive environment to explore new cultures and develop as young adults, with a focus on service learning and cultural exchange. The number of participants served in the resident and day camps for boys and girls was approximately 1,239 in 2025. The number of participants served in the travel and service programs was approximately 147 in 2025. Other related persons served was 700 in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.99; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $287K · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.3M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.