Twloha Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260789229
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Melbourne, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3214993901
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hot Line, Crisis Intervention Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,102,478
- Expenses
- $3,576,821
- Assets
- $2,614,285
- Liabilities
- $975,895
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHAN MONTESERIN (PRESIDENT)
- MORGAN HARPER NICHOLS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK CODGEN (CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER): $130,414 total reported compensation
- LINDSAY KOLSCH (CO-EXE DIR/CFO): $128,178 total reported compensation
- JAMES LIKENESS (CREATIVE DIRECTOR): $124,297 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To write love on her arms is a non-profit movement dedicated to presenting hope and finding help for people struggling with depression, addiction, self-injury, and suicide. Twloha exists to encourage, inform, inspire, and also to invest directly into treatment and recovery.
What it reported doing in 2024
The supporter engagement program is at the heart of the twloha movement, where people carry this conversation into their communities. We have a variety of activities that volunteers can engage in to help us achieve our mission. This looks like people participating in our annual campaigns for suicide prevention month (1,738 participants) and our spring campaign centered on building mental health resiliency through movement in honor of mental health month in may (2,418 participants). Each campaign is designed to help people advocate for mental health stories, challenge stigma, and offer support to those hurting through outreach. Between the bells is a one-week interactive program designed for high school students to spark authentic conversations about mental health and to remind those struggling that they are not alone. This free program educates students about common mental health struggles, what help and resources exist, and how they can play a key role in their community. In 2024, we worked in 82 schools, reaching 52,490 students, with 53 participating schools having a title 1 low-income status.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.5%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.1%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.5% of revenue deployed · 68.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 11 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 35 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.