Twin Rivers School Police Associati
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853861169
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,330
- Expenses
- $38,039
- Assets
- $25,492
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CORY YEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CORY YEN (PRESIDENT)
- DAVID PRICE (VICE PRESIDE)
- CARMEN AGUILERA (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide respresentation for its members in matters relating to employment, working conditions, and benefits. To provide and encourage the continuance and improvement of a disability and retirement system for the associations members and improve the morale and general welfare of the members.
What it reported doing in 2025
A. Collective bargaining: (60%) the association is the recognized employee organization for its members in matters related to employment, working conditions, and benefits. The association negotiates with the twin rivers school district on behalf of its members to create a collective bargaining agreement. When the district violates terms of that agreement, the association files grievances as necessary and represents members in any communications with the district. The association also engages in routine interaction with district and police department management officials to address day-to-day issues that arise related to member working conditions. This activity was initiated upon formation of the organization, and occurs primarily at the school district police department or the district main office, both of which are in sacramento, California. All directors of the association participate in this activity. B. Litigation: (5%) the association enforces its rights and the rights of its members on matters affecting terms and conditions of employment in state and federal courts. All directors participate in the decision making process on any litigation matters, and the board directs the work of retained corporate counsel. The litigation takes place in administrative, state, and federal courts. This activity was initiated upon formation of the organization. C. Discipline defense: (25%) the association assists and represents its members in disciplinary proceedings for matters within the course and scope of employment, and provides access to legal services for that purpose. All directors participate in this activity. This activity was initiated upon formation of the organization, and occurs primarily at the school district police department. D. Political activity: (10%) the association interacts and associates with political officials and organizations in the furtherance of its members interests. The association affiliates with the peace officers research association of California, an organization which provides affiliate services and lobbies on behalf of the interests of law enforcement officers in the state and federal legislatures. The association meets with local politicians, especially members of the school district board and candidates for board office, to lobby for the interests of its members. The majority of our expenses is paying the mastagni law firm and porac which provides legal services for our membership for any violation of our terms of agreement or grievances as well as providing a bargaining representative for negotiations with the school district. Porac (police officers research association of California) expenses is for representation of all members that are part of porac and also provides porac ldf (legal defense fund) which mastagni is a part of and ldf provides legal service to our members. Porac also provides training to our members, such as internal affair training, associations bargaining training, treasure training 101, union labor training as well as other training . All of our members benefit from this expense. We currently have 20 members. The second expense is our traveling expenses for conference and symposium. The conference and symposium provides training for our board of directors to bring back to our members. It provides networking with other police association labor unions and updates with new legislation affecting law enforcement within the united states. All of our members benefit from the information that is provided to them by the board. The third expense is donating money to our members to help them out for unforeseen circumstances or struggles. Donations are provided to our members for funeral services, catastrophic events such as medical expenses and newborn gifts and donation. Christmas drive to help needy families in our school district. We also donate to the foothill k9 association fundraiser for the retired k9 dogs. All members benefit from these expenses. The fourth expense is meals and e
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.8%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.