Twin Oaks at Tygart Estates HOA Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475490194
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Grafton, WV, USA
Phone
3042161701
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeowners & Tenants Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$33,006
Expenses
$30,919
Assets
$105,577

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daniel Young (President)
  • Randy Watkins (President)
  • Christopher Knotts (Vice President)
  • David Bender (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Daniel Young (President)
  • Randy Watkins (President)
  • Christopher Knotts (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of the Association is to manage, maintain, and improve the common infrastructure and shared property within the community, including the maintenance of private roadways, in order to promote safety, accessibility, and overall quality of the neighorhood. The Association also provides essential services that support the preservation and enhancement of property values for the benefit of its members.

What it reported doing in 2025

Other expenses incurred by Twin Oaks @ Tygart Estates, HOH, Inc. in 2025 included $735 for accounting and tax preparation services, annual filing fee to the State of West Virginia $25, Liability Insurance $407, Office Supplies $58, Postage $157, printing and copying expense $26 and facility rental expense, $571.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.41; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.