TWIN CITIES SOCIAL COHESION INITIATIVE DBA Richfield Leadership Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831944771
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Richfield, MN, USA
Phone
6125810874
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,929
Expenses
$11,998
Assets
$23,236
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bradley J Skoog (Executive Director and Treasurer)

People named in this filing

  • Hayley Tomkins (Chair)
  • Emmanuel Blackshear (Secretary)
  • Rori Coleman-Woods (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The twin cities social cohesion initiative seeks to create a reservoir of trust, good will and resilience, so as to meet the practical challenges of living together with mutual respect and shared responsibility.

What it reported doing in 2025

Richfield Leadership Network (RLN) went through a year of transition in 2025 - now operating as a fully volunteer led organization with no paid staff members. This led to a decrease in programming, but an uptick in strategic planning, and a focus on team building among the BOD. Each individual invested their time and resources back into serving the city in various ways. For example, BOD members showed up to help with the annual Great Pumpkin Giveaway and other community-wide events and service projects. They also advocated for their neighbors and networked with local businesses, schools, and community groups to see how RLN could best show up as a unique asset and resource for those who live, work, learn, and play in Richfield.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.4%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 30.9%; rating input score 31

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -39.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -35.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.4% of revenue deployed · 30.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.