Twilight Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 463990919
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2022–2025
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location: Dalhart, TX, USA
Phone: 5753094847
Rating: 76
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $72,354
Expenses: $35,819
Assets: $183,927
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

KARI BEZNER (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

KARI BEZNER (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)
NATALIE PEEPLES (SEC/TREAS/DIRECTOR)
KELLY WHITCAVITCH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is organized exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986 (or the corresponding provisions of any future united states internal revenue law). The twilight fund shall serve those in the dalhart community who are undergoing cancer treatments by paying for travel and/or lodging expenses.

What it reported doing in 2025

Serves those in the dalhart community who are undergoing cancer treatments by paying for travel and/or lodging expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 68
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 81
Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 50.9%; rating input score 51
Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 50.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.13; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 50.9% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.