Tushka Ohoyo Adams Davies

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831934559
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Vista, CA, USA
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing, Shelter N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$106,177
Expenses
$103,564
Assets
$89,453

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Andrea Zon Frilli (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dr Ana Y Davies (Director I)
  • David M Davies (Director II)
  • Carmen M Armijo (Director III)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Tushka Ohoyo Adams-Davies is dedicated to restoring dignity promoting healing and expanding opportunities for individuals impacted by trauma incarceration homelessness and substance use disorders. The organization provides safe sober and supportive recovery housing combined with culturally responsive trauma-informed wraparound services. These services include case management recovery support life skills development and mentorship all designed to support long-term stability personal growth and successful community reintegration.

What it reported doing in 2025

Tushka Ohoyo Adams-Davies provides recovery housing and supportive services to individuals impacted by trauma incarceration homelessness and substance use. In 2025 the organization operated recovery residences in San Diego County offering participants stable housing and access to case management peer support and life skills training. These services supported individuals in early recovery and those transitioning from incarceration contributing to improved housing stability reduced recidivism and increased long-term recovery outcomes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -87.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.