Turning Point Community Programs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942609766
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Sacramento, CA, US
Phone
(916) 575-1615
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$94,770,215
Expenses
$91,538,097
Assets
$55,635,178
Liabilities
$30,228,194

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALFRED R ROWLETT (CEO - RET JAN 2025)
  • DIANA J WHITE (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CYNTHIA ARNETT (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $420,297 total reported compensation
  • JEFFREY GRAY (PHYSICIAN): $406,149 total reported compensation
  • ALFRED R ROWLETT (CEO - RET JAN 2025): $369,027 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To offer caring, hope, respect, and support on the path to recovery and mental health.

What it reported doing in 2024

Tpcp also provides unique services through its transitional support services (tss) programs located within sacramento, solano, sonoma, and butte county. Tss programs provide community support services to adults challenged with co-occurring psychiatric disorders and developmental disabilities. The type and intensity of services provided will be based on the minimum level of intervention necessary to maintain the health/safety of the individual and to support progress toward their identified goals. Tss is designed to minimize dependency and to effect the most rapid "normalization and community integration possible. The central aspect of the tss program is member choice. Before an individual is offered tss membership, they will be helped to understand the tss philosophy. Tss will honor each person's expressed goals.in sacramento county, tss services are provided through two locations: tss south and tss north. In the 24/25 fiscal year, the tss north program served 82 unduplicated individuals while the tss south program served 79 unduplicated individuals. For tss north, of the 82 individual served, 91.5% did not accrue psychiatric hospital or homeless days, 98.8% did not accrue jail days, and 95.1% did not accrue emergency interventions. For tss south, of the 79 individuals served, 86.1% did not accrue psychiatric hospital days, 96.2% did not accrue homeless days, 96.2% did not accrue jail days, and 91.1% did not accrue emergency interventions. Lastly, tss north received an overall satisfaction rate of 93.1% while tss south received an overall satisfaction rate of 97.1%.tss santa rosa served 47 unduplicated individuals of which 93.6% did not accrue psychiatric hospital days, 100% did not accrue jail days, 95.7% did not accrue homeless days, and 93.6% did not accrue emergency interventions. The program also received an overall satisfaction rate of 96.7%.in solano county, tss services are provided in two locations: tss fairfield and tss vacaville. For tss fairfield, 149 unduplicated individuals were served within the fiscal year and an overall satisfaction rate of 95.3% was reported. Tss vacaville served 99 unduplicated individuals of which 97.0% did not accrue psychiatric hospital days, 99.0% did not accrue jail days, 100% did not accrue homeless days, and 92.9% did not accrue emergency interventions. The program also received an overall satisfaction rate of 96.2%.the tss program located in butte county, tss chico, served 71 unduplicated individuals of which 98.6% did not accrue psychiatric hospital days, 88.7% did not accrue homeless days, 100% did not accrue jail days or emergency interventions.turning point community programs operates a full service partnership (fsp) high intensity mental health services (himhs), formerly referred to as the integrated services agency (isa) in sacramento. Himhs services generally include the provision of psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery services for adults with psychiatric disabilities and extended histories of long-term hospitalization. The goal is to help individuals "take charge of their lives" through informed decision-making along with psychiatric, rehabilitative and psychosocial support. Services are based on the individual's long-term goals and desired results. The himhs served a total of 313 unduplicated individuals within the 24/25 fiscal year. In that reporting period, of the 313 individuals served, 79.9% did not accrue psychiatric hospital days, 94.6% did not accrue incarceration days, 87.9% did not accrue homeless days, and 84.7% did not accrue emergency interventions. The program received an overall satisfaction rate of 82.8%.in sacramento county, tpcp's pathways to success after homelessness provides comprehensive, integrated mental health services including housing for 350+ children and their families, transition aged youth, adults, and older adults. Pathways provides permanent supportive housing and mental health services for those with psychiatric disabilities and long-ter

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 6 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $81.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $420K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.