Turner Institute of Ecoagriculture Inc C/o Christine Hung
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851700153
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4042908544
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Biological & Life Sciences
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,850,833
- Expenses
- $2,162,084
- Assets
- $75,602,000
- Liabilities
- $312,107
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARTER KRUSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DAVID K WITHERS (PRESIDENT)
- JEREMY GINGERICH (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CARTER KRUSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $129,873 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Institute's mission is to research, develop, practice, and disseminate sustainable strategies and techniques for conserving ecosystems, agriculture, and rural communities. Institute will achieve this mission by using its livestock, land, scale, and biological diversity to research and demonstrate how ranching operations can meet economic and production objectives while protecting and enhancing natural resource and conservation values of large landscapes. In a broad sense this concept can be referred to as ecoagriculture, an emerging area of scientific study regarding how sustainable agriculture and ranching can be conducted across diverse landscapes while maintaining ecosystem services and integrity, and contributing towards solutions for local and global issues (e.g., climate change, native species and habitat loss, environmental contamination, water depletion, food production, and rural economies) rather than exacerbating them.
What it reported doing in 2024
3. Movement and habitat use of reintroduced bolson tortoises in southern New Mexico. The bolson tortoise is the largest and rarest of the six gopherus species native to north america. Today, however, fewer than 2,500 individuals remain in the wild, all of which are restricted to discontinuous basins in the mapim sub-province of north-central mexico, representing >90% extirpation from their pleistocene range. The turner conservation trust operates the only large-scale ex situ breeding program aimed at conserving bolson tortoises and establishing assurance populations within their pleistocene range in the united states. B the specific objectives of our research includes: a. Compare vital rates and survivorship between released and captive juvenile tortoises as a function of size, environmental factors, and habitat characteristicsb. Evaluate habitat use and movement patterns as a function of environmental conditions and habitat featuresc. Provide recommendations to the bolson tortoise recovery project and the usfws for future tortoise reintroductions.4. Population dynamics and life history characteristics of rio grande cutthroat trout (rgct) in the upper rio costilla watershed, New Mexico. Rio grande cutthroat trout currently occupy about 12% of their historical distribution. To restore rgct natural resource management agencies have instituted various conservation efforts including habitat restorations, species reintroductions, and removal of nonnative fish. Unfortunately, baseline population demographics and dynamics data for lentic populations are largely lacking. These data are necessary for understanding how lentic populations function and for guiding management actions. Furthermore, population-level data can help to identify potential threats (e.g., unsuitable habitat, overexploitation) to the persistence of these critically important populations. The overall goal of our research is to aid the conservation of rio grande cutthroat trout through an improved understanding of the ecology of lentic populations. The specific objectives of our research are to: a. Evaluate the relationship between population structure and habitat characteristics in lakes and streams of the upper rio costilla watershed.b. Evaluate the influence of environmental conditions and population demographics on the timing and extent of adfluvial behavior of rio grande cutthroat trout in costilla resevoir.c. Evaluate potential factors influencing population persistence of rio grande cutthroat trout using a stage-structured population model.d. Provide recommendations to the turner institute of ecoagriculture for the management of rio grande cutthroat trout in lake of the rio costilla watershed.5. Mammalian and herptofauna inventory of the z bar ranch. The gypsum hills of south-central Kansas represent a rugged landscape of mesas and bluffs, with eroded canyons and red soils. This prairie landscape contains a number of small rivers and streams that transect the region promoting additional habitats, including wetlands, forested patches, and areas of sandy alluvial soils. The overall purpose of our research is to conduct an inventory of mammals and herpetofauna on the ranch. This will provide a benchmark for understanding which species reside on the ranch, seasonality in which they occur and reproduce, and habitats used by them. Our objectives include: a. Detect presence of and describe habitat associations of rare, imperiled, or unknown mammalian, amphibian, and reptilian species to inform management activities and conservation projects at the ranch.b. Inventory and provide relative abundances and habitat associations of small mammals and herpetofauna communities at the ranch.c. Provide undergraduate students with professional and research opportunity and experience concerning natural history and habitat use patterns of small mammal and herpetofauna occurrences at the ranch.6. Nuclear single nucleotide polymorphism (snp) analysis of yellowstone np satellite herd.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.5%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 34.97; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -32.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.5% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 16 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $131K reported
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.