Turner 12
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753016359
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2147390888
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $166,118
- Expenses
- $204,254
- Assets
- $155,309
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- John Carter (Executive Dir.)
- Earl Jones (Chairman)
- David Stone Vice Chair (Chairman)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Turner 12 prepares students to become college graduates and productive citizens through educational enrichment, mentoring, community involvement and exposing students to higher learning and life-changing experiences.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Turner 12, Inc organization focuses on one specific program...The Turner 12 Program. Four subprograms are underneath this one including the Academic Enrichment Program, our Summer of Choice, Parent Meetings and Spring Break College Tours. The Academic Enrichment sessions provide additional academic support in areas of writing, reading and test taking strategies that keeps our students ahead of their peers. The Academic Enrichment impacts The 12. Our Parent Meetings are designed to inform and encourage our students, as well as their parents, on our monthly themes while also acknowledging our students' academic achievement, per each six week grading period. The Summer of Choice impact fluctuates between 15-20 individuals based on friends invited by The 12. Lastly, the Summer of Choice program is a holistic curriculum that speaks to our students? overall development as young men and women as well as future leaders within their communities. Parent Meetings are usually 25-30 in attendance. Our annual Spring Break College tours provide students with first-hand experiences and knowledge of area institutions of higher learning that proves advantageous, over the course of six-year experience, by assisting students with making the most educated decision about the college/university that will be suited for them post high school graduation. Students are able to interface with college students, professors and other personnel who provide invaluable information and insight to both the pros/cons of college life thus enabling students to get a truer understanding of what to expect over the course of the four years of their college/university experience.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -23%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $172K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.