Tupelo Cycling and Multisport Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921055579
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Tupelo, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6625662847
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,610
- Expenses
- $14,060
- Assets
- $2,366
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW BALLARD (President)
- MATTHEW KNIGHT (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- CHRIS HUTCHINSON (Treasurer)
- ANDREW BALLARD (President)
- COURTNEY BALLARD (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Tupelo cycling & multisport club (tcms) is a bicycle and fitness club serving tupelo, ms, and surrounding areas. Our club is committed to:1. Providing a positive, friendly, & safe environment for our members and guests of all skill levels to pursue their health and fitness goals.2. Promoting a safe, friendly social environment and atmosphere in which our members can build friendships and network with fellow cyclists of diverse backgrounds and experiences.3. Engaging in all forms of cycling: road, trail, gravel, and triathlons.4. Raising awareness and resources for various local charitable events through participation and representation by our members. We support our mission statement:1. Tcms has organized rides: tuesday/thursday nights throughout the road cycling season, and monday, tuesday, and thursday nights during mountain bike and gravel season. 2. Planned charitable events to participate and represent such as pedal for hope, pedal for life, tour de bodock, and velvet ditch grand
What it reported doing in 2025
Tcms has approximately 110 members and strives to provide a positive, friendly, & safe environment for our members and guests of all skill levels to pursue their health and fitness goals. Tcms has a goal of providing an atmosphere in which our members can build friendships and network with fellow cyclists of diverse backgrounds and experiences.tcms engaged in all forms of cycling: road, trail, gravel, and triathlons. Finally, tcms raised awareness and resources for various local charitable events through participation and representation by our members.program service accomplishments included maintaining local mountain bike trails at trace state park and tombigbee state park. Other accomplishments included the jeff bonds memorial fitness fundraiser, community engagement with 18 local partners and sponsors to raise awareness for safe cycling, as well as participation in 40+ cycling and multisport events as a team. Our club helped put on the tupelo sprint triathlon. We hosted quarterly social coffee shop rides. We engaged in quarterly club meetings. We participated in a community clean along mitchell street (one of our cycling areas) in tupelo. We helped to sponsor the tour de bodock, a metric century fondo held on the tanglefoot trail in pontotoc ms. As part of our charitable purpose, tcms helped to provide over 130 bikes for needy children through the salvation army. We started a bike helmet giveaway program for the homeless that ride bicycles in our community as well.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.5%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 45.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -28% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.