Tulsa Zoo Management Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 730930870
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9186696600
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,832,092
- Expenses
- $18,379,087
- Assets
- $38,504,766
- Liabilities
- $842,194
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDSAY HUTCHISON (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LINDSAY HUTCHISON (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $163,033 total reported compensation
- JOE BARKOWSKI (VP OF ANIMAL CONSERVATION & SCIENCE): $135,407 total reported compensation
- ELLEN AVERILL (VP OF COMMUNICATIONS & STRATEGY): $112,412 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.
What it reported doing in 2024
Tulsa zoo management, inc., fomerly tulsa zoo friends, inc., was formed for the purposes of promoting and supporting the improvement of tulsa zoo which exhibits over 3,500 animals. The zoo grounds and physical structures are owned by the city of tulsa, but tulsa zoo management has an agreement with the city of tulsa to run all operations at the zoo. These operations include collecting admissions, operating various concessions, operating special events, operating all animal departments, maintaining building and ground maintenance of the zoo, providing security for the zoo, promoting the zoo and maintaining a zoo membership program. Tulsa zoo management is also responsible for directing all fundraising for capital improvements and future exhibits at the tulsa zoo. Tzmi education engaged 245,717 visitors and program participants through its education initiatives, including camps, classes, outreach programs, nature exchange, animal encounters, and educator chats. Tzmi education, with support from the opportunity project and quiktrip, provided high impact education programming to youth in the city of tulsa. Funding awarded to tzmi through the opportunity project's expanded learning initiative and quiktrip sponsorship funding supported outreach programs for 6,330 tulsa public schools youth through ost (out-of-school-time) expanded learning afterschool and summer programs. In total, 492 outreach programs engaged 11,018 participants in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 68% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 59
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 86%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 70.8%; rating input score 71; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.9% of revenue deployed · 86% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 28 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 42 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.