Tulsa Metro Women on Fire Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831466687
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Coweta, OK, USA
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,812
- Expenses
- $49,598
- Assets
- $48,221
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kendall Taylor (CEO Co-Founder)
People named in this filing
- Alexa Reed (COO Co-Founder)
- Kendall Taylor (CEO Co-Founder)
- Matthew Lay (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Tulsa Metro Women on Fire is a nonprofit organization dedicated to empowering women through education training and mentorship in the fire service. Our mission is to provide hands-on learning opportunities leadership development and outreach programs that inspire femalesespecially those 16 years and older with no prior experienceto explore careers in firefighting and emergency services. Through programs like Camp Fierce and Fierce on the Frontline we aim to remove barriers to entry foster confidence and capability and build a more inclusive and prepared future fire service workforce.
What it reported doing in 2025
Oklahoma Women on Fire coordinated and hosted Camp Fierce a hands-on firefighter training and mentorship program designed for young women ages 16 and older interested in the fire service. Participants received training in firefighting skills leadership teamwork physical fitness search and rescue ladders hose operations and firefighter safety. The program provided mentorship opportunities with experienced female firefighters and instructors from multiple departments. 40 participants and over 50 volunteers benefited from the program during the reporting year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.7%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 51.6%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -39.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.7% of revenue deployed · 51.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.