Tulsa Girls Art School Project Inc

What it reported doing in 2025

See schedule otulsa girls art school was founded in 2007 to provide a safe, supportive, and enriching after-school environment for under-resourced girls in the tulsa area. Originally focused on nurturing artistic ability and introducing basic financial concepts, the program has since evolved into a holistic youth development model. While art remains the core medium, the art school now integrates critical thinking, financial literacy, social-emotional learning, and self-discipline to equip girls and tools for life-long success. The school serves girls in grades third through twelve, with the opportunity for students to stay in the program for up to ten years. All programming, including transportation, supplies, meals, field trips, mentorship, and instruction, is provided at no cost to families. High school students are eligible to participate in a summer out-of-state trip that includes museum and gallery visits, artist workshops, and peer bonding experiences. This trip is often their first time traveling outside of their city. Throughout the year, students create and curate artwork for public exhibitions. A portion of each art sale is deposited into individual micro-savings accounts for the students, to be used upon graduation. These events build skills in teamwork, time management, public speaking, and financial literacy. Today, the art school serves girls from nearly twenty (20) different schools. The goal of the program is for students to graduate from tulsa girls art school with a strong belief in their power to succeed in life, equipped with the skills necessary to become capable, contributing community members.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
• Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
• Fundraising efficiency: $8.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
  • Compensation committee: Missing
  • Independent consultant: Missing
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
  • Written employment contract: Missing
  • Compensation survey or study: Missing
  • Board or committee approval: Pass
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

• Operating margin: -35.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings