Tulsa Day Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731557819
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9185835588
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,621,402
- Expenses
- $8,970,802
- Assets
- $26,354,981
- Liabilities
- $2,773,631
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAYSHA ANDREWS (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- SARA DELGADO (PRESIDENT)
- SHAROLYN WHITING-RALSTON (PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MACK HALTOM (EXECUTIVE DIR.): $145,348 total reported compensation
- LESLIE PETTY (CLINIC DIRECTOR): $143,482 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.
What it reported doing in 2024
Case management - case managers work one on one with clients as life-skilled coaches and help provide better access to resources and support systems to move towards maximum self-sufficiency. They offer assistance in setting goals and establishing priorities and advocate on the client's behalf. Through case management we seek to identify barriers keeping a client from permanent housing and working with the client to remove such barriers. Case managers had over 18,161 case management contacts in 2024. They assisted 780 individuals applying for birth certificates or other forms of identification to enable that person to seek employment or housing. 689 clients were assisted in filling out a housing application with 283 of those becoming successfully housed. Every client has access to individualized general and mental health case management. 6,366 referrals were made to other service agencies and organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.94; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.3% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 24 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $345K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.