Tulare Kings Service Center Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770142050
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Visalia, CA, USA
Phone
5598163486
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,731
Expenses
$68,322
Assets
$64,250

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN CALVIN (Director)
  • CHRISTOPER SAENZ (Treasurer)
  • WENDY COLSON (Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Its purpose is to provide a center for exchange of information and discussion of actions under consideration by the California teachers association (cta) state council of education. The council serves as a forum and hearing body on issues referred through cta. The coucil coordinates membership participation in the cta activities, assets in setting programs and service needs, and refers concerns to cta.

What it reported doing in 2023

To support the nea and cta missions and goals; hold service center council & steering committee meetings prior to each state council meeting; conduct program evaluation surveys & annual budget hearings; conduct membership recruitment activities; conduct workshops & coordinate training; conduct multiunit state council elections; implement political adn legislative programs; support coordinated bargaining; facilitate human rights & women's issues activities and facilitate instructional and professional development activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.