Tufts Medicine
Legal name: Tufts Medicine Integrated Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871600172
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Burlington, MA, US
- Phone
- 7813563336
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health, General and Financing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,967,834
- Expenses
- $65,379,975
- Assets
- $186,863,023
- Liabilities
- $107,619,194
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILY YOUNG (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
Highest reported compensation
- PHIL OKALA (DIRECTOR (UNTIL 7/25)): $1,816,696 total reported compensation
- ANDREW DEVOE (DIRECTOR (AS OF 7/25)): $1,148,895 total reported compensation
- ZACHARY REDMOND (SECRETARY): $693,637 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring together private practice and employed physicians, community-based and academic care providers, and primary care and medical and surgical specialists to improve care and reduce costs for defined populations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Participating in the center for medicare and medicaid services ("cms") aco programs.implementing healthcare programs designed to promote quality improvements and cost savings and thereby lessening the government's burden associated with providing medicare benefits.establishing an integrated healthcare delivery system that improves the quality of medical, surgical, behavioral and other related health care services provided to patients through fostering such initiatives as clinical integration among primary care physicians and specialists and among community and academic physicians and hospitals, implementing coordinated electronic health record systems, developing best-practice-based protocols, and providing wellness care and other techniques and systems.improving the provision of medical and health care to patients through the creation of a data base of medical records, public health information and population demographics.developing financial incentives through payer contracting to improve the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of care and to enhance health care outcomes for the populations served by the physicians and hospitals associated with the corporation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 71
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.3%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 64.7%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.86; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 56.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 57.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 52.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 59.3% of revenue deployed · 64.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.8M · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $31.4M reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 61 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.