Tucson Commercial Real Estate Women Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810570178
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Lawrence, KS, USA
- Phone
- 5203274218
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $182,978
- Expenses
- $158,894
- Assets
- $140,590
- Liabilities
- $32,102
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROSEMARY BRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
- LINDSAY WELCH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- ASHLEY STEWART (PRESIDENT ELECT-ELECT)
- MELISSA LAL (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROSEMARY BRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
- LINDSAY WELCH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- ASHLEY STEWART (PRESIDENT ELECT-ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a forum for women actively involved in commercial real estate to promote professional ethics and integrity, to provide educational opportunities, to expand centers of influence of its members, to utilize a support network, and to beneficially influence the direction of the city of tucson.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024 the organization continued to grow its membership to over 100 members. We hosted educational lunches throughout the year and several special events that engaged members and non-members in the community. Board member engagement was strong. Strategic planning was a focus in 2024 and efforts to streamline board efforts continue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.2%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.2%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.2% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.