Tucker Community Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550687098
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Parsons, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3044782930
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,134,942
- Expenses
- $2,922,979
- Assets
- $37,604,855
- Liabilities
- $36,821,698
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID MORAN (PRESIDENT)
- DONNA PATRICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID COOPER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID COOPER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $62,770 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Public foundation to benefit tucker county, West Virginia. Provide educational scholarships to area residents and funding to other associations in and around tucker county, West Virginia such as librarys, rescue squads, cemeteries, churches, cities and towns, etc.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided educational scholarships to area residents and funding to other associations in and around tucker county, west virigina such as librarys, rescue squads, cemeteries, churches , cities and towns, etc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 59.8%; rating input score 60; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 43.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.87; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.98; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $63K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 34 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 28 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.