Tualatin Valley Volunteer Firefighters Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 936030173
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Tigard, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5036498577
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,170
- Expenses
- $33,127
- Assets
- $159,919
- Liabilities
- $2,447
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL MARSHALL (PRESIDENT)
- SHAYAN JOOBBANI (FINANCIAL VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL MARSHALL (PRESIDENT)
- SHAYAN JOOBBANI (FINANCIAL VICE PRESIDENT)
- JEFF WILLIAMS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The members of the tualatin valley volunteer firefighters association are dedicated to fostering safety, professionalism, and active community engagement in the areas we live and serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community outreach program: the volunteer association hosts various community events to further the community's engagement with their local fire department and to be a source of support and joy. The most notable event being the toy & joy gift giving event for kids in need during the holidays in the newberg area. In 2024-25 the volunteer association provided gifts to 659 children and teens. The event was organized by the volunteer association with contributing gifts from other community partners. Total expenses contributed by the association were $13,585, including both supplies and gifts. Additionally, the association contributed $1,000 to the cystic fibrosis foundations stairclimb. Overall community outreach activities totaled $19,848
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.9%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.83; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.