Trpil Community Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251858482
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7242235115
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,735,440
- Expenses
- $24,982,989
- Assets
- $4,546,640
- Liabilities
- $3,324,793
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHONA EAKIN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SHONA EAKIN (CEO): $236,367 total reported compensation
- STACY KEMMLER (CFO): $178,054 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To establish a system whereby direct services are provided to individuals with disabilities and their families within the context of the independent living philosophy of full integration, consumer control and choice; and encouraging individual and group advocacy on significant issues affecting people with disabilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Vfi community services provided personal assistant services (pas) home care services under the consumer employer delgated model empowering program recipients to assist in the hiring and managing of their direct care givers. Support included providing billing, payroll, and payroll tax services of over 700 participants. Vfi communiity services conducted personal care training and certified all pas workers for performance of work as personal care attendants using the principles of consumer control and independent living.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $23.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $236K · 11 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $5.7M reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.