Troup County Board of Realtors Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581719394
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fayetteville, GA, USA
Phone
7068842600
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boards of Trade

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,922
Expenses
$37,450
Assets
$86,951

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAYSI BROOKS SWOL (PRESIDENT)
  • ALISA MATHENY (PRESIDENT- E)

People named in this filing

  • CAYSI BROOKS SWOL (PRESIDENT)
  • ALISA MATHENY (PRESIDENT- E)
  • JARED JONES JR (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The troup county board of realtors operates as a local realtor association affiliated with the Georgia association of realtors (gar) and the national association of realtors (nar). It generates funds through annual membership dues and utilizes these for membership education and to promote and maintain high standards of conduct through nar code of ethics, furthering the interests of home and other real property ownership, community service in the troup county area and membership in gar and nar.

What it reported doing in 2025

To promote and maintain high standards of conduct in the real estate profession. To unite those engaged in the recognized branches of the real estate profession for the purpose of exerting a beneficial influence upon the profession and related interests. To provide a unified medium for real estate owners and those engaged in the real estate profession whereby their interest may be safeguarded and advanced.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.4%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.5%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.32; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.