Triple H Ranch Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
660999881
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Saint Thomas, VI, USA
Phone
5125509490
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,423
Expenses
$76,173
Assets
$21,337
Liabilities
$181,513

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Tiffany Muse (Chairman, Director)
  • Andrea Turco (Treasurer, Director)
  • Emily Fletcher (Secretary, Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our organization's primary exempt purpose: 1) provide emergency relief, shelter, and rehabilitation as well as protection and care for Thoroughbred racehorses and any abused, neglected, abandoned, or unwanted horses and 2) create and promote charitable, educational and rehabilitative programming for children, adults, special needs persons and veterans in a safe and nurturing environment in the United States Virgin Islands, furthering the traditions and history of Caribbean horsemanship and agriculture.

What it reported doing in 2025

The ultimate goal is for the retired horses to be adopted to homes in the mainland with plenty of grazing and unlimited access to vet care. Returning them to the States is an expensive, difficult journey involving multiple flights, quarantine in Puerto Rico, etc. We have 7 horses making the trip by the end of June, so we are constantly raising money to get them off island and to a happy ending for their lives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.51; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.