Trinity University
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741109633
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2109997301
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- University or Technological Institute
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $350,520,667
- Expenses
- $292,190,012
- Assets
- $2,441,443,432
- Liabilities
- $272,143,979
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
55 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Vanessa B Beasley (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Craig Crow (Chief Investment Officer): $1,165,679 total reported compensation
- Vanessa B Beasley (President): $794,411 total reported compensation
- Michael Bacon (VP Alumni Relations and Development): $437,359 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Trinity University empowers purpose for life. Trinity’s mission is to foster student success through enduring excellence, intentional inclusion, and perpetual discovery. We offer a unique and personalized educational experience that blends the humanities, STEM, and pre-professional programs in an urban residential setting. We are committed to interdisciplinary experiential learning and undergraduate research, using abundant resources to support and enhance the student experience. We look forward to welcoming you to our campus and continuing our journey together. Vanessa B. Beasley, Ph.D.
What it reported doing in 2024
Trinity University, one of the nation's top private undergraduate institutions, is known for its superior academic quality, personalized attention with outstanding faculty, exceptional resources, real-world preparation, and vibrant campus life. Trinity is a community that encourages students to discover, grow, and become passionate, productive individuals. The University's principal focus is on undergraduate education, but it also offers selected graduate programs in professional fields. In addition, the University provides various research and other sponsored projects as well as public service programs of continuing education, intellectual enlightenment, and cultural enrichment. The University attracts talented and highly motivated students to its predominantly full-time, residential student body. Enrollment was 2,595 annual students for FY25 which represents the full-time equivalent of undergraduate and graduate students; 4.8% of these students come from outside the United States and 78% are from within Texas. The University received 12,506 first-year undergraduate applications for fall 2025 with an acceptance rate of 26%. The University's yield was 20%, generating enrollment of 650 first-year students. Student charges (net tuition, fees, room and board) were $88 million. Total scholarships and grants were $82.6 million. The source of funding for these scholarships includes operating funds, endowment funds and external grants and contribution revenue. Scholarship and student aid expenses continue to grow, reflecting the University's commitment to providing access to a broad spectrum of students and increased market competition in recent years. Although student tuition continues to increase, net student revenues are growing at a significantly slower pace in recent years due to the increased number of students receiving financial aid and the increase in the average aid package per student. Trinity University completed another strong year in pursuit of its mission to educate and mold the leaders of the future in a residential liberal arts environment. The University is well positioned to complete its robust strategic vision of defining the liberal arts experience for the 21st century.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 62% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.36; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 37 of 37 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $233.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 55 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $37.3M reported
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.