Trinity High School Troy-ann Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204075241
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Euless, TX, USA
Phone
8176815720
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,415
Expenses
$51,411
Assets
$36,236
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Erin Horak (President)
  • Jennifer Castillo (Vice President)
  • Kynyata Carpenter (Co Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Erin Horak (President)
  • Jennifer Castillo (Vice President)
  • Kynyata Carpenter (Co Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support the athletic and artistic talents and all Trinity High School students participating in Troy-Anns Dance Team and its Directors in all activities. Provide financial support otherwise not supported by the school budget to supplement, accessories, and supplies. To support higher education, awareness and team spirit.

What it reported doing in 2022

Flocking Fundraiser to increase awareness of Troy-Anns. Flamingos were placed in the yards of the community with a letter from the group requesting donations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 13
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 14.6%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 9

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 14.6% of revenue deployed · 9.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.