Tribe Lacrosse Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462962661
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- La Canada, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5599369061
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $113,603
- Expenses
- $90,577
- Assets
- $63,997
- Liabilities
- $2,400
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREG MOLINELLI (President)
People named in this filing
- GREG MOLINELLI (President)
- PETER KNIGHT (Secretary)
- LACEY MCLOUGHLIN (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This entity has been formed as a non-profit youth organization to promote andsupport teaching lacrosse for both boys and girls from 1st through 12th grade inthe northeast los angeles area.
What it reported doing in 2024
This entity has been formed as a non-profit organization to promote and supportteaching lacrosse for both boys and girls from 1st through 12th grade in northeastlos angeles area. The organization instructs over three hundred players, 60% boysand 40% girls, that participate in a recreational youth league in the spring andoffers training and development throughout the rest of the year. The number ofplayers continues to grow. Scholarships are available for players experiencingfinancial hardships.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.9%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.9% of revenue deployed · 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $74K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.