Triangle Motorcycle Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921572462
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Harpster, OH, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,355
Expenses
$78,863
Assets
$139,040
Liabilities
$43,121

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT SHAW (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT SHAW (PRESIDENT)
  • WAYNE TRAXLER (VICE PRESIDE)
  • ELISHA COTRILL (SECRETARY &)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and stimulate interest in motorcycles and motorcycle racing for social, recreational and patriotic purposes, and supervising and conducting motorcycle, quads and all other forms of racing

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote and stimulate interest in motorcycles and motorcycle racing for social, recreational and patriotic purposes, and supervising and conducting motorcycle, quads and all other forms of racing, activities relating thereto; to lease, rent or aquire real estate by purchase and any equipment that may be used in connection there with in clubrooms, fairgrounds, parks, or other private and public places that may be leased or rented for race meets, social, or recreational activities, and the doing of all things necessary and incident thereto.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.76; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -63.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.