Tri-State Women Warriors
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990880092
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Dubuque, IA, USA
- Phone
- 3122062131
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,624
- Expenses
- $10,386
- Assets
- $52,330
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christina Schauer (President)
- Dawn Fleming (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Christina Schauer (President)
- Dawn Fleming (Vice President)
- Brandi Herring (Marketing Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a social welfare organization for women veterans and service members.
What it reported doing in 2025
$1,955: March Empowerment Series: A series of events during the month of March focused on a variety of wellness activities including movement (yoga), art (ceramic painting), connection (duckpin bowling), resiience (Shine with Schaefer) and serving others (Red Basket project). 70 attendees in total; 37 individual women veterans. $1,855: Monthly Meet Ups: A meet and greet takes place the first Saturday of every month for women veterans and service members to find each other and connect. Food is provided. Attendance ranges from 15-25 women per month x 12 months. $972: Christmas Family: We provided Christmas presents and household items for a young woman veteran's family of 5 over the Christmas season. See Other Expenses for more info
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.3%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 75.6%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.04; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.3% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.