Tri County Mutual Town Insurance Co
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390663760
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Iron River, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7153728577
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $338,785
- Expenses
- $556,153
- Assets
- $593,748
- Liabilities
- $173,641
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBRA LARSON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT OGREN (SECRETARY/TR): $9,596 total reported compensation
- DEBRA LARSON (PRESIDENT): $2,033 total reported compensation
- GARY PETERSON (VICE PRESIDE): $596 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Town mutual insurance sales
What it reported doing in 2023
Underwriting fire, lightning, extended coverage, & inland marine insurance in ashland, bayfield, & douglas counties.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -64.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $10K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.