Tri-county Literacy Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853125784
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Glens Falls, NY, USA
Phone
5187937414
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Remedial Reading, Reading Encouragement

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,892
Expenses
$94,524
Assets
$89,289

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GUIN FORSHEY (PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH BRACKEN-BODIE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROSEANN ANZALONE (EXEC. DIR)
  • GUIN FORSHEY (PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH BRACKEN-BODIE (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improve lives by fostering literacy skills among members of our community through practical, learner-centered education. Provide adults in warren, washignton and saratoga counties with necessary resources and skills needed to advance the ahievement of , literacy goals while also providing opportunities for independence and economic mobility.

What it reported doing in 2025

Create a literacy rich community of neighbors in warren, washignton and saratoga counties

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.6%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 45.6%; rating input score 46

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.8%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.6% of revenue deployed · 45.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.