Tri County Family Medicine Program
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 160997545
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dansville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5853353416
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,921,848
- Expenses
- $17,265,286
- Assets
- $8,424,332
- Liabilities
- $1,308,861
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAYMOND J MARTEL (PRESIDENT)
- F SCOTT HICKS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KAREN STONE (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- AYESHA TASADDAQ MD (PHYSICIAN): $322,972 total reported compensation
- GEOFFREY W WITTIG MD (PHYSICIAN): $265,216 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH DEPRA MD (PHYSICIAN): $265,129 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Tri county family medicine program is a not-for-profit medical group practice, established to provide quality medical care for all patients with understanding that medical fees will be based on the individual's ability to pay; to provide an organization capable of delivering ambulatory, inpatient, and emergency care; to provide an organized family medicine program capable of attracting new physicians to the tri-county area; to cooperate more closely with the public and private social agencies; to promote economy of operation for the benefit of health care consumers; to participate, so far as circumstances may warrant, in any activity designed and carried on to promote the general health of the tri-county area communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Six tri county family medicine program health centers serve rural communities in western New York. Tri county is an fqhc health center look-a-like. Services are provided to uninsured patients. Approximately 16,667 served.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 79.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $323K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $111K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.