Tri County Contractors Association Industry Advancement Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810629504
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Pleasant Prairie, WI, USA
Phone
2626577716
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boards of Trade

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,772
Expenses
$48,682
Assets
$371,555

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOHN CAMOSY (Chairman)
  • DAVE CECCHINI (Trustee)
  • JASON RASCH (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A three county organization established to improve and advance the interest and common good of all engaged in the construction contracting business in the areas of safety, public relations, and market development.

What it reported doing in 2024

Receive, hold, administer and disburse funds to be used in promoting and advancing the construction contracting business and industry in, but not limited to, the counties of Racine, Kenosha and Walworth, WI and vicinity, and more particularly safety promotion, accident prevention and plans and means for improving public and personnel relations, market development, negotiation and administration of collective bargaining agreements, coordination between construction owners and otherwise promote and advance the interest and common good of the construction industry in the specified vicinity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.1%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 56.7%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.63; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.1% of revenue deployed · 56.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.