Tri Cities Local Business Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820831273
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Richland, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5099909155
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,081
- Expenses
- $90,461
- Assets
- $34,626
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM DAVID MCCORMACK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JOHN PETER GONSKY JR (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DON MARK GERBOTH (DIRECTOR)
- PATRICE MCEAHERN (DIRECTOR)
- RUSS WATSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The tri-cities local business association represents tri-cities businesses and labor organizations that provide products and services to the us department of energy and its prime contractors for hanford site environmental cleanup programs.
What it reported doing in 2025
The tri cities local business association contributes to the sustainable and growing regional clean energy & environment-related business segment through training, support and promotion of regional businesses to be part of the u.s. And global clean energy and environment supply chain. We bring together business and labor members to address supply chain gaps, create competitive solutions and foster innovation while members partner to pursue new market opportunities. Cy 2025 highlights included a featured role in the tri cities-based bridging partnerships small business symposium; participation in the first tri cities occurrence of eteba's business opportunities exchange event; and cohost for the epri supply chain workshop for structural components in advanced energy systems.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 19
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.3%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.