Tri-cities Lady Bulldog Athletic Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200318888
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Red Oak, GA, USA
Phone
4049811976
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$3,100
Assets
$57,200
Liabilities
$6,200

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Elijah Granberry III (Co-founder)
  • Shenita Granberry (Co-founder)
  • Janice Davis (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of the TCLBAF, Inc. is to expose all urban challenged female (and males) youth in the Tri-Cities Community (East Point, College Park, Hapeville, and South Fulton County) to sports, performing arts (including musical engineering, arranging and mixing), and both academic and athletic scholarship opportunities. Scholarship or afterschool programs are future grant initiatives. Currently we have been investing in travel to support competitions and graduations to the student athletes and arts majors that we have helped in the past. The organizations fed a plethora of urban-challenged kids with needs this year. Dance shoes and running spikes/waffles were also provided to athletes that were in need. This year I must continue to invest in more workshops on fundraising and branding. My assets that I donate and the land endowment is increasing in value now. The student athletes that are in need are accomplishing many goals and are in need of more feudal support (travel).

What it reported doing in 2021

Currently we have been mentoring and transporting urban-challenged youth in the Tri-Cites community back and forth to practices or securing funds to provide transportation for the student artist/athletes. By asking donors to provide Marta cards or gas cards for transportation. After practice nutritious snacks are provided as well for about 2-3 athletes a week. Plus mentoring has become a major theme this season. Future plans are to take the land and build a pre-manufactured home in an effort to support transitional daily needs to artist and athletes that need effective support throughout their tenure and post-secondary options. This year I need to step it up because not only do students need help- but former graduated still need assistance. Therefore, I need to publicly solicit in an effort to keep successful commitments to student-athletes/artist that are in need. I plan on gaining more training to the Foundation Center in an effort to gain access to metro mailing list in an effort to fund raise for those in need instead of solely depending on myself to carry all in need. Service provided, The organization: sponsored a flight from Atlanta to Phoenix for a parent to see her oldest child compete in a major track meet; we assisted and athlete travel from Atlanta to Jacksonville to Daytona in an effort to transfer the student athlete to a better environment; we sponsored a trip and meal for family of 5 to Phoenix for a graduation. The young lady is the first to graduate high school and college in her family. A Sumna Cum Laude graduate and Pac12 Scholar Athlete of the Year (2 time All-American)

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.45; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.6% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 8 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2009 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.