Trellis for Tomorrow

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270268541
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Phoenixville, PA, USA
Phone
6108864900
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Grantmaking Foundations N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,341,882
Expenses
$1,155,491
Assets
$1,255,210
Liabilities
$382,663

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BOB PRACHAR (PRESIDENT)
  • KAY HUNSBERGER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $98,838 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We empower individuals and communities by providing experiential programs that teach life skills and promote food security and sustainability.

What it reported doing in 2025

Trellis for tomorrow (the organization") is a nonprofit organization located in phoenixville, Pennsylvania. Trellis for tomorrow works to build resilient communities from the ground up. Trellis offers three highly effective and impactful youth development programs that intersect in myriad ways.see description of programs on schedule o of return.food for all (ffa) is a collaborative gardening program that provides life-giving, high-impact community engagement opportunities for partnering organizations including corporations, universities, faith-based institutions, non-profits, and other community groups. Staff design and install attractive raised-bed gardens at each partner site and provide all necessary resources and education for participants to manage the garden. Growing partners commit to donating at least half of their harvest to local pantries and other food assistance agencies, which has an immediate and significant impact on access to nutrient-dense produce for community members adversely affected by limited access to fresh foods. Since its inception in 2013, ffa has engaged volunteers to grow hundreds of thousands of pounds of produce that generated over a million servings of fruits and vegetables for neighbors in need.seed skills (seed) is a year-round youth development program built around student-led enterprises and environmental discovery. Adolescents, aged 12-18, engage in classroom and garden-based activities and receive mentorship that builds workforce preparedness and life skills while fostering leadership and personal agency. Programming has the added benefit of improving access to fresh, organic produce for participants and their communities. An "earn while you learn" program, seed simulates a true work environment in a safe and supportive space. Under guidance from expert staff, participants come together to create and implement an equitable, community-building business model that has them collaborating and problem-solving with real-life scenarios.a natural progression from seed is our grow careers (grow) program. Grow is a highly effective internship training and placement program for youth ages 16-24, giving participants meaningful experiences as they get real opportunities in the workplace. Trellis recruits interns and provides valuable training through active and ongoing mentorship, 1x1 and group coaching, workshops, and workplace simulations. Trellis matches interns with area non-profits and social impact businesses for paid internships, providing ongoing support to both the interns and the host sites. Post-internship, trellis continues to be available as a mentor and resource to help interns process their experience and advance their education and/or career goals.beyond this, the newly established agricultural learning center at lundale farm is a place of inspiration and education as a catalyst for people to grow food where they live, work, learn, and play. The alc serves as a regional hub, providing seedlings, produce, and education that creates a wide range of positive impacts across four counties. The goal of the alc is to provide an opportunity for local individuals and organizations to learn about innovative, sustainable, urban agricultural systems and methods that they can employ in their own communities, along with basic techniques for managing those systems and methods. The alc is a resource hub, providing interactive exhibits and volunteer experiences that are appropriate for field trips and larger groups, as well as more specific education and training opportunities for smaller groups. The development and implementation of a learning center fulfilled lundale's goal to provide education into the community and provided the land and a greenhouse space that trellis needed to support both the propagation of seedlings (80,000-100,000 per year) and a space to develop urban agriculture learning exhibits and workshops.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.1%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.1% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $974K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $99K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.