Trees of Hopeorg Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264140561
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9542603333
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Sexual Abuse, Prevention
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $638
- Assets
- $103,603
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NICOLE ESCOBAR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM TORRES (PASTOR)
- DAVID SLAVIC (COO)
- NICOLE ESCOBAR (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the trees of hope team is to educate parents, schools and churches on ways to prevent sexual abuse and to provide relevant resources and support for those how have been hurt by this epidemic in our society. We focus on making our community a safer place for children and a more difficult environment for sexual predators. The advocates of trees of hope know from personal experience how painful the wounds of sexual abuse can be and have seen that victims of abuse can greatly benefit from support and healing. Trees of hope is committed to equipping others to help stop sexual abuse. Form 990-ez, part iii, line 28, program service accomplishments: prevention workshops: discover practical ways to stop sexual abuse before it affects a child in your life. Each workshop is designed to provide helpful tools and resources to parents and child care providers as they safegaurd their children. Form 990 ez, part iii, line 29, program service accomplishments: small group study: our small
What it reported doing in 2025
Small group study and healing: see schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 162.39; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $638 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.