Tree Davis

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943169363
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Davis, CA, USA
Phone
5307587337
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$753,581
Expenses
$742,885
Assets
$538,600
Liabilities
$23,924

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ann Daniel (President)
  • Robert Poppenga (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Yael Franco (Executive Dir.): $58,189 total reported compensation
  • Torin Dunnavant (Executive Dir.): $24,120 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Tree Davis is to improve the health and resilience of our communities by enhancing and expanding Climate-Ready Trees and Landscapes through direct action, community engagement, and advocacy.

What it reported doing in 2025

Tree Davis draws upon the strength of community and science to improve our neighborhoods, area cities, and surrounding natural areas by planting trees. We are making our environment healthier and more resilient. Established by civic leaders in 1992, Tree Davis has had many accomplishments that profoundly impact Davis, West Sacramento, Winters, and Woodland. As the impacts of climate change become clearer, the importance of a vibrant urban and community forest to mitigate against increased temperatures, air pollution, and water contamination, and its capacity to enhance biodiversity is ever more critical.2025 was a pivotal year for Tree Davis. As with many mission-driven organizations, we experienced leadership transition that invited reflection, renewed focus, and thoughtful engagement from our board and staff. Through it all, our commitment to planting trees and growing community never wavered.This year marked an important evolution in our approach - we formally integrated public education into every tree planting and care event. By pairing hands-on experience with accessible, on-site learning, we ensured that each tree planted was also an opportunity to deepen community understanding of the critical ecological, economic, and social benefits of urban forestry.We also completed the tree planting component of the CAL FIRE funded Climate ReadyUrban Forestry Education grant. Over the life of this initiative, we expanded environmental literacy, strengthened partnerships throughout Yolo County, and equipped young people with tools to steward trees in a changing climate. As the grant sunsets, we carry forward the lessons learned into our ongoing programming.2025 saw significant progress in the Cool Schools Yolo project. We continued tree planting efforts while preparing for the next phase of site development and construction, laying the groundwork for greener spaces for students in Woodland and West Sacramento.2025 program accomplishments included: Tree Davis strengthened its partnership with the City of Davis, making furtherprogress to reach the Urban Forest Management Plan of no net loss and replaceevery tree removed. During the year, Tree Davis planted 175 trees street trees and six meaningful tribute trees. These trees were planted in partnership with individual residents, community groups, student groups, and neighborhood groups.Tree Davis staff and volunteers continue to work diligently to give proper maintenance to newly planted trees for their first five years - watering regularly, weeding away competing vegetation, adding layers of mulch, and periodically pruning. We are so grateful to our 30+ year partnership with the City of Davis Urban Forestry Department.Tree Davis completed the final tree plantings for The Climate-Ready UrbanForestry Education program. This CAL FIRE funded program provided high schoolstudents from Yolo County with in-class lessons and real-world experience on an array of topics related to urban forestry including exploring the various benefits of urban forests, Climate-Ready Trees, environmental justice, civic engagement, and more. Each school cohort culminated with a tree planting on their school campus or in a nearby public space. Overall, Tree Davis staff engaged with ~40 students in 2025 and planted 52 trees on school campuses, in parks, and along streets with the students.The Cool Schools Yolo program celebrated its first round of tree plantings across campuses in West Sacramento and Woodland. With help from partners, Tree Davis planted 356 new trees across all nine school sites with the support of dedicated volunteers. Although construction for the remaining project elements has beendeferred to 2026, these initial plantings have already generated strong enthusiasmamong students, staff, and the broader community. The newly planted treesrepresent an important first step toward creating more resilient school environments, while building momentum for the full scope of campus improvements to come.Tree

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $38.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $606K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.