Treasure Valley Roller Derby Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465717956
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Boise, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2083719090
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $73,665
- Expenses
- $66,981
- Assets
- $66,364
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Meg Hurley (Executive Pres)
- Stacia Mason (Secretary)
- Ana Mamani (Financial Pres)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Treasure Valley Roller Derby (TVRD) mission is to serve women, non-binary, and gender-expansive individuals through the exhilarating sport of roller derby. We invite and welcome individuals from all backgrounds, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity to experience the community that TVRD and roller derby provide in offering a safe, inclusive and supportive space for all. TVRD is run entirely by dedicated volunteers who are committed to our mission of empowerment and community improvement.
What it reported doing in 2025
1.TVRD experienced tremendous growth in 2025, expanding membership sufficient to sustain three teams and submitting a second team for WFTDA sanctioning. TVRD hosted three (3) events; a showcase for all the derby leagues in our community, the revival of our Spudtown Knockdown Tournament, and five (5) additional home games. The Gem State Jammin Showcase, allowed the Treasure Valleys co-ed, juniors, and sister leagues to showcase their membership and programs as well as expose them to the diversity of other leagues, officials, and programs offered. The Revival of Spudtown Knockdown, stretched over a weekend, brought three teams from the Western United States, bringing an influx of athletic talent and officials from across the nation to experience Boise.2. This year TVRD focused heavily on the development of the new skaters program, exposing approximately 100 new skaters to our inclusive roller derby community and drafting onto teams approximately 20 skaters who bring an exceptionally diverse injection into our local roller derby community. With the growth in membership, TVRD was able to donate approximately 500 hours to the sustainability of our organization and toward strengthening and development of our community through volunteer and partnership; specifically partnering with other local charitable organizations. TVRD was also able to continue their dedication to making charitable cash donations to other charitable organizations.3. Traveling to other teams is a necessary expense in the world of roller derby. TVRD exists on an island being the only WFTDA sanctioned team in Idaho. This does mean TVRD must travel out of the state to compete. To ensure the skaters are now wholly responsible for the costs of this travel, TVRD set an astounding fundraising goal of $30K. This $30K is 100% designated to fund our skaters lodging for away games, which is necessary when securing opponents to come to Boise. TVRD has a supportive fan base that is both dedicated and generous having contributed to a significant portion of the $30K goal. TVRD also participated for the first time in Idaho Gives and ran a very successful campaign to include winning prizes for the most contributions and contributions from all 50 states. TVRD fell just a few hundred dollars shy of that goal in 2025. Nevertheless, 2025 has been our most successful year for fundraising and increasing membership.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $66K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.