Treasure Coast Volleyball Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650725938
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Stuart, FL, USA
Phone
7722607368
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$19,761
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JEANNE EVANS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • CURTIS BURNAM (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MIKE MOEHRING (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Treasure coast volleyball is an organization that provides "club" volleyball to girls (players) in the treasure coast area by providing as high a level of volleyball as possible.

What it reported doing in 2016

Treasure coast volleyball is an organization that provides "club" volleyball to girls (players) in the treasure coast area. The organization falls under the Florida region of the united states volleyball association (usav). Club season runs approximately five (5) months of the year. The organization provides volleyball instruction and practices to prepare the players for regional tournaments, as well as national tournaments. Tryouts are held and teams are formed. Each player pays tuition and all tuition is paid for by parents. The organization does not solicit any donations or contributions. The tuition paid is used for volleyball equipment, balls, gym usage rental fees, uniforms, hotel rooms for the teams during tournaments, travel costs, membership fees required by usav and amateur athletic union (aau), insurance, clinics and special training. The goal of this organization is to provide a means for continued volleyball beyond the regular high school season.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -86.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -64.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.