Treasure Coast Paws for Progress Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993075145
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Fort Pierce, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7722018127
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,908
- Expenses
- $4,348
- Assets
- $41,716
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY DEAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KIMBERLY DEAN (PRESIDENT)
- CARRIE OCONOR (TREASURER)
- LOURIE LABERINTO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide direct support to the animals at the Fort Pierce Animal Adoption Center for both urgent medical care and enrichment programs. Our primary goal is to provide Community Programs such as Low Cost Spay/Neuter Program contracting with local veterinary hospitals. Maintain a Animal Food Bank Program. Promote and support adoption at the local shelter. Promote responsible Pet Ownership.
What it reported doing in 2025
Assistance provided to the animals at Fort Pierce Animal Adoption Center: We have provided funds for urgent medical care provided to animals brought into the shelter that otherwise we would be facing euthanization due to their injury and/or medical condition upon arrival. We have spent just over $10,000.00 in support. Animal Food Bank - We are looking to join forces with a local animal food bank so that we can assist with distributing pet food were it is needed We have been slow in moving forward due to a name change and have been waiting for the local low cost vet clinic to open which was to open in early 2025 but is still on hold so that we could join forces and secure the necessary grants to begin the low cost spay/neuter programs for the area
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 5
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.9%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 5
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.59; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.9% of revenue deployed · 5.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $239 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.