Treasure Coast Dental Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
651065110
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Port St Lucie, FL, USA
Phone
7722343333
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Medical Disciplines

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,790
Expenses
$14,879
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSE A SARASOLA III (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSE A SARASOLA III (PRESIDENT)
  • RYAN ASKELAND (TREASURER)
  • STACEY GREEN (EXCUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The promotion and advancement of dentistry to its members, students and the community by providing continuing education courses and financial assistance to local students and by providing a forum for fellowship among its members to promote the pursuit of ethical quality dentistry

What it reported doing in 2020

Provide continuing professional education courses and meetings, promotion of dental health and quality dentistry through education and peer reviews

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 27.4%; rating input score 27

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -210.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -34.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -41.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -34.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 27.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.