Traverse City Dance Project

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822391695
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Traverse City, MI, USA
Phone
2316312195
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Reported finances

Revenue
$206,458
Expenses
$236,125
Assets
$33,868
Liabilities
$46,288

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jennifer McQusiton Lott (President)
  • Susan Kettering (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brent Whitney (Treasurer)
  • Jennifer McQusiton Lott (President)
  • Susan Kettering (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Corporation shall have the purpose of supporting the creation and promotion of the arts, including visual and performance art, and providing education regarding the arts. The purposes include: to build and stage a bold mixture of new and existing dance works to inspire and educate audiences to collaborate within the community where performances are located to provide a creative laboratory for dancers and choreographers and to commission music.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, continued its community tour to four Northern Michigan communitiesKalkaska, Charlevoix, Frankfort, and Traverse City, as well as a pop-up showing at Little Fleet for community members, all showings free of charge. For many, this was their first exposure to live dance, and you made it possible to reach them. During the tour, we included two free pre-performance classes for kids in Kalkaska and Charlevoix, and collaborated with Fitchs School of Dance in Kalkaska, to provide an opportunity for local students to perform right alongside TCDPs professionals. The summer tour brought together six professional dancers, a cellist, a DJ artist, and a passionate technical team. Through partnerships with the Garden Theater, the Kalkaska Downtown Development Authority, Charlevoix Parks and Recreation, and the Northern Michigan Disability Network, the organization deepened community connections while creating new opportunities for artistic collaboration. This season also featured the commissioning of original works by three choreographers, enriching the dialogue between artists and audiences throughout Northern Michigan. TCDP successfully maintained their intern program, now in its second year, that provides invaluable hands-on experience to two college students in arts administration and production. The company also provided two additional recent college graduates their first professional contract as apprentices. It is this kind of mentorship that helps nurture the next generation of leaders in the arts. The biggest event of the season was the launch of the first ever Northern Michigan Dance Festival. This three-day event featured four unique performances, including educational opportunities such as a school show for over 250 students. Presented in collaboration with the Dennos Museum Center, the school program introduced young audiences to a variety of dance forms and included a creative movement workshop led by our Directors and professional dancers. The festival brought together more than 25 dancers and musicians to present unforgettable performances of both world-renowned and world-premiere choreographic works. This vibrant fusion of movement and music was the result of years of planning and partnership building a true testament to what our arts community can achieve together.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.37; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $214K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.