Trauma Associates of Georgia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582629878
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Milton, GA, USA
Phone
7703379147
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Specifically Named Diseases

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,000
Expenses
$25,578
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REGINA MEDEIROS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • REGINA MEDEIROS (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES SARGENT (TREASURER)
  • KATHY SEGO (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Trauma associates of Georgia, inc. Is organized to provide a forum for trauma care delivery professionals. The purpose of the organization is to inform the public in the field of trauma, to educate and train nurses, hospital personnel, paramedics, police and other in techniques for the treatment and comfort of persons who have suffered trauma, collect and share statistics relative to trauma, and to encourage the creation of community programs to prevent injuries, improve care, and to minimize the disability resulting from trauma.

What it reported doing in 2015

The organization holds a trauma conference to educate and train personnel in the field of trauma and those that have been affected by trauma as well as to provide statistics to those involved.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -96.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.