Trar Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990400866
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Phone
6159338487
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,256
Expenses
$3,464
Assets
$1,792
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Thomas Jakob Rangsikul (President)
  • Anjali Prakash Raman (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Thomas Jakob Rangsikul (President)
  • Anjali Prakash Raman (Vice President)
  • Nikhil Partap Kahlon (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

TRAR Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to cultivating a sustainable future where food waste is reduced and access to nutritious food is a right not a privilege Our mission is to empower communities through the exchange of produce and pantry staples fostering a culture of sharing By connecting neighbors we aim to create a resilient network where surplus food becomes a resource rather than waste Together we can combat food insecurity and build stronger more nourishing communities for all Our flagship platform Porch2Porch serves as a free delivery service which delivers recovered food waste to those who can use the food before its expiration We have expanded Porch2Porch to include produce boxes and homemade meal deliveries around Nashville

What it reported doing in 2024

0

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.1%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.