Transportation Development Association of Wisconsin Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391154596
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Madison, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6082567044
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $554,538
- Expenses
- $556,226
- Assets
- $621,879
- Liabilities
- $5,189
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRACY JOHNSON (IMMEDIATE PAST-PRESIDENT)
- ROBB KAHL (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
- JASON CULOTTA (PRESIDENT)
- JERRY DESCHANE (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- DEBORAH JACKSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DEBORAH JACKSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $187,484 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The transportation development association of Wisconsin is devoted to promoting the interest and vitality of the state's multi-modal transportation system.
What it reported doing in 2024
The transportation development association of Wisconsin is a statewide alliance of 400-plus stakeholders committed to advancing the best in transportation. Tda members include businesses, labor unions, citizen groups, units of government, and individuals. All share one important goal: the development and maintenance of a safe, modern, interconnected transportation network that will support a robust economy and enhance the quality of life for everyone in Wisconsin.tda was one of the first transportation groups in the nation to bring together such a broad-based membership to advocate for all transportation types. Today, more than 15 states have multimodal membership organizations like tda.tda is a leading force for a more efficient transportation network in Wisconsin. Most recently, tda led the highly successful "just fix it" campaign, which resulted in the most significant infusion of new, ongoing revenue into the transportation fund in decades. Spearheading broad-based coalitions is nothing new for tda. In the november 2014 election, tda and partners were instrumental in giving Wisconsin voters a voice on protecting the state transportation fund. Tda is one of the few organizations that could have built and maintained a broad-based coalition one that remained unified for more than six years to ultimately garner support from 80 percent of the electorate to amend the state's constitution and protect the transportation fund.tda puts gubernatorial and legislative candidates on the record on transportation funding and works with Wisconsin business, industry leaders, and local officials as they call for better public transportation. Tda also promotes the importance of Wisconsin's commercial ports and other modes of transportation and takes a stand for responsible transportation funding. Through these efforts and many others, tda continues to inform the discussion of nearly every transportation issue in Wisconsin.tda provides vital information about Wisconsin transportation to members, journalists, and policymakers at every level of government. Tda routinely publishes newsletters, policy updates, and significant studies related to transportation and earns praise for taking complex information and making it understandable and relevant for a broad audience. Tda also holds public forums, participates in key grassroots alliances, and responds to media inquiries with credible, thoughtful, and useful content. Tda meets regularly with civic organizations and business groups throughout Wisconsin to talk about transportation issues.because of tda's sizeable and diverse membership, policymakers view the association as a balanced voice for transportation.everybody understands that a transportation network must be integrated to support economic growth no mode can stand alone. What makes tda unique is that our membership represents every element of the state's transportation system while fostering agreement on the best course for Wisconsin's transportation policies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 26 of 26 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $187K · 27 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.