Transplant and Donor Advocacy Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873891395
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
4122611842
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,088
Expenses
$114,216
Assets
$303,883
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL W GREALISH (PRESIDENT)
  • PATRICIA GREALISH (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTA TEVAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL W GREALISH (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL P GREALISH (CHAIRMAN)
  • PATRICIA GREALISH (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Transplant & donor advocacy network, inc. Is a charitable organization whose mission is dedicated to saving lives by reducing the number of adults and children on transplant waitlists and by optimizing transplant outcomes. Support will be provided for the transplant donors, recipients, and their families, and will maximize living organ donation with a four-tiered approach: education, advocacy, research, and support.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization was formed in 2021 and received funding at the end of 2022. Below is the description of the organization's programs that are planned to begin once the planning stage is complete.support will be provided for the transplant donors, recipients, and their families, and will maximize living organ donation with a four-tiered approach: education, advocacy, research, and support.education: by educating and mentoring members of the community to promote awareness of the importance and process invollved in being a living donor.advocacy: by advocating for better legislation on both the state and federal levels to protect the rights of living donors, transplant recipients, and those on transplant waitlists.research: by funding grants through the organization's annual research funding program, our hope is to inspire new ways to increase live donors than ever before, and more people are able to get lifesaving transplant and keep it.support: by providing support to living donors, transplant recipients, those who are waiting for a transplant, and their families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.9%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.66; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 137.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -56.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.