Transformational Leadership Collaborative Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863025714
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lithonia, GA, USA
Phone
7706346551
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Law Enforcement

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$200
Assets
$809
Liabilities
$5,250

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUCY CANNON (PRESIDENT)
  • CARMEN EKDAHL (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • LUCY CANNON (PRESIDENT)
  • CARMEN EKDAHL (CEO)
  • DAVINE RICKS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The transformational leadership collaborative (tlc), inc. Has been organized as a non-profit to create and implement a program leading to a substantial reimagining of how public safety work is approached and concurrent services supporting the implementation of 21st century public safety approaches. This mission includes developing collaborative alignment between key stakeholders in the community - to include public safety departments and their leadership; peace officers; training and direct service personnel; and community members and organizations seeking improvements in the nature and structure of policing. The objectives under this mission include but are not limited to: reducing and eliminating conflict and tension between providers and recipients of public safety services; addressing and mitigating issues of inherent bias and other key impediments to the building of trust and coordination between public safety officers and the communities they serve, with specific emphasis on rela

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing consulting, coaching and training services (including mental health training) to police departments, leadership, and officers to attain the preceding goals and objectives.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.04; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.49; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -93.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -120% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $200 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.