Transfer the Power Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201593796
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Eagle, ID, USA
Phone
2088593531
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Media, Communications Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$192
Expenses
$6,700
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIMOTHY J BURKE (President)

People named in this filing

  • TIMOTHY J BURKE (President)
  • MARY E BURKE (Secretary)
  • RONALD D COATE (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create products that develop and promote good character, honesty, and integrity in all areas of life. The foundation creates and distributes media products focusing on social media for christian churches and other christian ministries through the use of illustrations, analogies, and parables.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Foundation's christian outreach focus is broad. It provides materials for young people, churches, and Para-church organizations, as well as downloads from the internet. The Foundation offers downloads of its media tools through Sermon Spice and Worship House Media, organizations which gathers and distribute media online. In addition, the foundation partners with other existing ministries (including global media outreach) to create social media outreach to develop spiritual growth and character development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3,389.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -28.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.